Those failing to comply with the National Security Act 2023 will find that the Act empowers police to arrest without warrants for threats related to foreign powers. Authorities could detain you for up to 14 days, potentially longer if emergency laws apply. The Secretary of State can issue State Threats Prevention and Investigation Measures (STPIMs) without needing criminal prosecution thresholds. Non-compliance can lead to severe jail time, up to 10 years for certain breaches like travel violations. Critics worry about its impact on journalism, comparing it to laws in Hong Kong. So, there’s much more to uncover about these impactful measures.
Section 27 (Arrest without a warrant)
Under Section 27 of the National Security Act 2023, the police now have the authority to arrest and detain anyone suspected of engaging in foreign power threat activity without a warrant.
Initially, this detention can last up to 48 hours, giving you a brief window to understand the situation. If the case demands, a court can extend this period to a maximum of 14 days. In exceptional circumstances, emergency legislation can stretch this period to 28 days, providing authorities more investigative time.
As someone detained under this section, you have the right to inform a named person about your detention and to consult a solicitor. However, there are instances where these rights might be delayed, especially if there’s a chance they could interfere with an ongoing investigation.
During detention, the police may collect biometric data, which they can retain for up to five years, regardless of whether you’re charged or acquitted. This provision aims to bolster national security by allowing law enforcement to act swiftly against potential threats while maintaining certain rights and legal processes for individuals, striking a balance between individual rights and national security.
Prevention and investigation measures
In considering the prevention and investigation measures of the National Security Act 2023, you’ll find that Sections 39, 56, and 57 play essential roles.
These sections and Schedule 7, paragraph 12 are designed to fortify the UK’s defences against espionage and political interference.
Let’s explore how these provisions enhance the nation’s ability to effectively detect and respond to threats.
Section 39
Section 39 of the National Security Act 2023 equips the Secretary of State with substantial authority to combat threats from foreign powers. It grants the power to issue notices that impose restrictive measures, known as State Threats Prevention and Investigation Measures (STPIMs), on individuals suspected of engaging in foreign power threat activity, a crucial role in the Act’s decision-making process.
This section is essential for safeguarding the nation against espionage, interference, sabotage, and similar threats.
These STPIMs closely mirror the framework of the previous Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIMs). They allow the government to take decisive action against individuals who pose a risk without necessarily having to meet the higher evidential thresholds required for criminal prosecution.
This means that if there is a significant threat, the Secretary of State can act swiftly to prevent potential harm.
These measures guarantee that national security is prioritised and that any involvement in activities threatening the UK’s stability and safety can be effectively curtailed.
Section 56
While Section 39 equips the Secretary of State with powers to issue State Threats Prevention and Investigation Measures (STPIMs), Section 56 underscores the consequences of failing to comply with these measures.
Suppose you’re subject to an STPIM and contravene any specified measure without a reasonable excuse. In that case, you’ve committed an offence under this section. It’s essential to understand that these aren’t just minor infractions. The consequences are severe, with a maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment hanging over such violations.
If you breach a measure specifically aimed at preventing travel outside the United Kingdom, the stakes are even higher. Section 56 imposes a harsher maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment in this case.
Furthermore, the usual grounds of claiming a “reasonable excuse” are excluded for this type of breach. This highlights the gravity the legislation places on preventing potential threats from leaving the country.
Section 56 is a stern reminder of the importance of adhering to STPIMs. It reflects the overarching aim of the National Security Act 2023, which is to reinforce national security by holding individuals accountable for actions that could undermine the safety and stability of the United Kingdom, underscoring the Act’s seriousness in maintaining national security.
Section 57
Section 57 grants significant authority for prevention and investigation measures when dealing with individuals subject to a state threats prevention and investigation measure (STPIM).
Authorities are empowered to enter and search the premises and the person when serving an STPIM notice. This means they can take immediate action if there’s a suspicion of absconding, a need to guarantee compliance, or a need to safeguard public safety.
The powers provided by Section 57 go beyond just entry. Authorities can seize and retain items found during these searches. This authority isn’t just about holding onto things; they can test them and use them as evidence.
Think of it as having a toolkit to dig deeper into potential threats and gather essential evidence without delay.
Interestingly, they won’t need a warrant for most searches, streamlining the process and allowing swift action. The only exception is when the search is specifically for compliance purposes.
This aspect of Section 57 underscores the importance of acting decisively to counter threats while balancing the need for oversight. It’s about giving agencies the tools to protect national security effectively and efficiently.
Sch. 7 para. 12
Although the National Security Act 2023 is already robust, Sch. 7 para. 12 adds another layer of scrutiny by allowing the Secretary of State to mandate polygraph sessions for individuals under a State Threats Prevention and Investigation Measure (STPIM).
If you are one of these individuals, you must participate in these sessions. This provision is designed to enhance the effectiveness of investigations and prevention measures by evaluating the credibility of those involved.
Polygraph sessions aren’t just a formality. They serve a vital role in gathering information essential in national security cases.
The results from these sessions can be shared with intelligence services, ensuring that relevant data reaches those who need it most. Information sharing bolsters the security framework by providing an all-encompassing view of potential threats.
Criticism of the provisions of the National Security Act 2023
The National Security Act 2023 has sparked significant criticism, particularly concerning its impact on investigative journalism. Critics argue that the act could criminalise reporters and whistleblowers, potentially stifling the free press.
Guy Black, the deputy chair of Telegraph newspapers, voiced concerns to the House of Lords, highlighting the risk that the legislation might inadvertently target those uncovering truths in the public interest. An amendment proposed in the Lords aimed to protect journalists by allowing a defence for those intending to publish material via recognised news outlets. However, this amendment was defeated by a majority of 130 votes.
In response to the backlash, the government modified some of the act’s language, such as changing phrases like ‘reasonably possibly may’ to ‘likely to’, in an effort to clarify the scope of offenses.
Despite these changes, fears persist that the act’s broad provisions could still threaten press freedom. Chinese media outlets have also criticised the act, comparing it to the stringent Hong Kong national security law.
However, Radio Free Asia has challenged these comparisons, which are described as misleading due to a lack of context.
Learn more about the National Security Act
The National Security Act 2023 bolsters the UK’s defences against espionage, foreign interference, and sabotage to safeguard national security. It introduces severe penalties for obtaining or disclosing protected information and trade secrets. It provides life sentences for severe espionage and sabotage acts. The Act updates regulations at sensitive locations, incorporating modern threats like drones. Police…
Read more … What is the Purpose of the National Security Act 2023?
How Can Security Professionals Comply With the National Security Act 2023? Workers in the security industry, including those who work in private investigation, close protection, or advise on corporate security and risk, are attractive targets for foreign powers to act as their proxies due to their specialist skillsets and their line of work often giving…
Read more … Complying with the National Security Act 2023
Private Security Services
Westminster Security provides professional private security services in London, the UK, and worldwide.